Some of the Biggest 2018 Midterm Surprises

Talking Points
November 16, 2018
Extra Edition
 
Information that helps explain or clarify the dynamics of the recent election is worth an extra edition. The tea leafs spread in the following article are good news for liberals.
 
[Yes, I used the L word. The hatchet job that wrong-wingers have been permitted to do on the honorable liberal tradition should never have been tolerated, much less accommodated by the use of a euphemism].
HJB

nytimes.com

The Chart That Shows Some of the Biggest Midterm Surprises


In ballot measure results, red states voted for progressive goals like Medicaid expansion and blue states voted against proposals to protect the environment.

By Josh Altic and Ryan Byrne

Mr. Altic is the editor of the Ballot Measures Project at Ballotpedia, where Mr. Byrne is a staff writer focusing on statewide ballot measures.

Election Day in
Miami. CreditCreditRhona
Wise/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

In many states, American voters cast their votes for ballot measures that resolved questions about raising the minimum wage, expanding access to health care, or expanding or contracting energy production.

Voters in some states may also have scrambled the 2020 political landscape, largely by changing the mechanics of who can cast ballots, and who gets to draw state and congressional district lines. But voters decided other issues too — on marijuana, Medicaid expansion and more — that will shape political debate.

Amendment 4, which won with more than 64 percent of the vote, restores voting rights to as many as 1.5 million convicted felons.

To put that in perspective, according to the most recent results in the state’s unresolved race for governor, Ron DeSantis, an Amendment 4 opponent, is ahead of Andrew Gillum, 49.6 percent to 49.2 percent — by fewer than 35,000 votes. In the recent election cycles, victory margins for presidential and gubernatorial candidates in Florida ranged from less than 100,000 to roughly 250,000.

We’ll have to wait until 2020 to see what effect will these new voters have on Florida’s highly competitive elections. But the amendment represents a sudden and significant change in Florida’s electorate, and it will almost certainly change the parties’ approaches to elections.

It’s also a good example of the impact that money can have on ballot measures: Supporters raised $25 million, while opponents spent nearly nothing.

Legislative and congressional district maps will look a lot different in at least four and possibly five states because of ballot measures passed in 2018.

Colorado, Michigan, Ohio (in May) and Missouri (and perhaps Utah, where voting is still unresolved) passed proposals that will take redistricting out of the hands of partisans and put them into the hands of balanced commissions or, as in Missouri, a demographer.

The 2018 results gave proponents of changing redistricting systems reason to think that voters are willing to hear them out. There is one more election cycle before redistricting in 2021. With state legislatures or political commissions controlling redistricting in over two-thirds of states, redistricting is something that voters could see on their ballots again.

In 2017, Maine voters were the first to approve a citizen initiative expanding Medicaid under Obamacare. Last week, Idaho, Nebraska and Utah voters approved their own expansion plans. Montana voters narrowly defeated a similar measure that would have extended the state’s already expanded Medicaid coverage and increased tobacco taxes to help fund the state’s portion of costs. (Tobacco companies spent $17.5 million against the measure.)

Voters have shown they support expanded coverage in states where elected officials haven’t. Fourteen states remain without expanded coverage, and at least six of them have some sort of process for citizen-initiated measures — and Medicaid expansion proponents may view their best way forward is through that process, not the legislature.

A clerk reaches for a container of marijuana for a customer at Utopia Gardens, a medical marijuana dispensary, in Detroit, last month.CreditCarlos Osorio/Associated Press

A clerk reaches for a container of marijuana for a customer at Utopia Gardens, a medical marijuana dispensary, in Detroit, last month.CreditCarlos Osorio/Associated Press

Proposal 1 legalized the recreational use of marijuana and created a framework for regulating the drug’s production and sale. It also placed an emphasis on industrial hemp, allowing farmers to cultivate and sell low-THC cannabis.

But marijuana advocates weren’t as successful elsewhere. In North Dakota, a legislation effort called Measure 3 was defeated. There were key differences between the two proposals. Michigan’s successful Proposal 1, much like previous ballot initiatives, aimed to regulate marijuana as alcohol is. North Dakota’s Measure 3 would have left details on possession and other matters up to the state legislature.

Several states with the initiative process have not addressed marijuana legalization, such as Missouri and Montana. A campaign is already underway in Ohio to get an initiative on the 2019 ballot.

Josh Altic is the editor of the Ballot Measures Project at Ballotpedia, where Ryan Byrne is a staff writer focusing on statewide ballot measures.

================
[Opinions expressed in Talking Points and in reader comments to Talking Points are the opinions of their authors and not necessarily of the Rockville Centre Democratic Club or its officers and directors]

For this and prior Talking Points or to make comments – visit  https://rvcdems.com/category/talkingpoints/